The collection

A worked example

Maya Bennett

Studio Practice — fictional brief Designed by the studio to a brief it wrote itself. The practice is fictional.

The site does not lower the threshold. It argues the threshold was pointing the wrong way.

A complete concept website for a fictional integrative relational counsellor in Bristol — and, published next to it, the strategic work that produced it. Every conclusion in the document sits beside the design decision it produced, so you can check the second against the first.

The Maya Bennett homepage: a large serif headline reading Most people start in the middle of a sentence, a photograph of afternoon light on a curtain beside it, two buttons, and a row giving the fee, session length and location.
The first screen, at 1440×900

What was particular

Most people decide they are not entitled to this before they decide anything else.

Maya works with adults who are often not in crisis — the long, functional stretch where everything looks fine from the outside and very little is felt. Many of them are contacting a counsellor for the first time, and they arrive apologising: for not having a proper reason, for taking a place someone else might need more, for being upset about something they have already decided is small.

The strategic move is not reassurance. This practice holds that the polished account is the less useful one, because it has already been edited by the person who needs help with the editing. So the site removes the preconditions somebody invents before counselling feels legitimate — a beginning, a serious enough reason, the right words, a prepared account — and then argues that the unprepared version is better material to start from.

Thinking, then design

Every decision on the page can be pointed at.

The document sets each strategic conclusion beside the thing on the website that came out of it. That is the part worth checking: open the site in one tab and the document in another, and see whether the second actually explains the first.

  1. The headline is the reader, not the servicePeople arrive mid-thought, with no beginning to start from. The largest type on the page is “Most people start in the middle of a sentence.” — a description of the reader’s state rather than a name, a service or a promise.
  2. Entitlement before anything elseThe second band, before any service copy, is a single claim: there is no threshold to cross first. Nothing is offered until the question of whether you are allowed to be here has been dealt with.
  3. Two vocabularies, neither one the price of admissionEight sentences people recognise, set large and on colour in the client’s own words. Then, under a rule, twelve plain search terms — small, uniform, and introduced as borrowed. The site publishes the search vocabulary without adopting it.
  4. The argument is demonstrated, not assertedA whole section sets four tidy bars against five loose cards, one of which is “No idea, honestly”. The loose ones arrive off-register and settle as you reach them, and never align to the tidy column above.
  5. Nothing that has to be asked forEight practical questions are answered in a ledger before any contact is made, and the reduced fee can be requested without proving anything. The enquiry itself needs two fields and one badly-put sentence.
Two pages from the Practice Clarity document: a dark cover reading Maya Bennett, and a page headed The opening, and the two vocabularies underneath it, setting six strategic insights against the website decision each one produced.
Thirteen pages. Written after the website rather than before it, and it says so on the second page — the strategic foundation that could credibly have produced the design, reconstructed from the finished work.

Read it

The thinking, in full.

Free to read, and it separates evidence from inference throughout: what the website demonstrably does, and what that suggests about the practice behind it. It is a portfolio case study rather than the written Practice Direction a commissioned practice receives.

PDF, 13 pages, about 140 KB. It opens in a new tab.

What is and is not being shown

Maya Bennett is not a real counsellor.

The practice, the room, the availability, the email address and the photographs are all invented for the concept. The five lines about training, membership, supervision and insurance are illustrative and deliberately unnamed: no professional body, course, registration number, supervisor or insurer is claimed, on the website or in the document. There are no testimonials and no outcomes, because inventing them would be dishonest rather than decorative.

The concept site says so on every screen and at every width, its credentials carry that note beside them, its enquiry form transmits nothing and says so, and it is kept out of search deliberately. Nobody can contact a counsellor who does not exist.

The crisis signposting on the concept site — Samaritans, NHS 111 and 999 — is real and correct, because a fictional practice is a poor reason to publish a wrong helpline number.

Where to next

The directions you can actually start from.

Maya is a case study rather than one of the directions in the collection. If you are choosing a starting point for your own practice, that is what the collection is for.